Online right to rent checker due this year
Home Office building digital tool to support compliance with controversial scheme
Credit: Yui Mok/PA
An online service allowing landlords to fulfil their obligations with the Home Office’s controversial right to rent scheme is due to launch later this year.
Since February 2016, private landlords are required to check the immigration status of all prospective tenants and ascertain whether they are legally allowed to rent property in the UK. Failure to comply is liable to result in fines of up to £3,000 per tenant or even a prison term of up to five years – if it is found there was “reasonable cause to believe” the tenant in question did not have the right to rent property in the UK.
The scheme, which was brought in as part of then-home secretary Theresa May’s ‘hostile environment’ agenda, has proven hugely unpopular with a comprehensive range of stakeholders, including organisations representing landlords and lettings agents, tenants groups, and charities dedicated to housing and human rights.
Among the many concerns raised about right to rent is the additional administrative burden on landlords of conducting the relevant checks.
To assist with this, it was reported last year that the government had begun work on an online service through which landlords could perform the relevant checks on individuals' immigration status.
Immigration minister Kevin Foster has confirmed that “the Home Office is planning to launch an online digital right to rent status-checking service to support landlords in conducting right to rent checks”.
No date has been set for the service to go live, but PublicTechnology understands the government intends to launch the tool before the end of 2020.
- Home Office holds firm on digital-only status for EU Settlement Scheme
- Windrush scandal fallout sees Home Office suspend data-sharing activities
- Home Office still working on fix for software issue that caused failure to notify EU countries of 75,000 convictions
Such a service would follow the April 2018 launch of a digital service allowing employers to check prospective employees’ right to work in the UK. The creation of this online service was supplemented by amended legislation and official guidance for employers “which sets out how they can use the online service in complying with their responsibilities” under immigration law.
“The Home Office is transforming the way migrants demonstrate their immigration status and right to work and rent in the UK,” Foster added, in response to a written parliamentary question from Labour MP Alex Norris.
While an online right to rent-checking service would allay some concerns about the scheme, the criticisms levelled against it are far broader and deeper.
Not least in the shape of the High Court judge who last year found that the programme is inherently discriminatory and in breach of human rights law.
That ruling, made by Mr Justice Martin Spencer, came following a legal challenge launched by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants. The challenge was supported by organisations including the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Residential Landlords Association – both of which have participated in the Landlords Consultative Panel convened by the Home Office to monitor the scheme.
Other organisations to have served on the panel include the British Property Federation, the housing charity Shelter, the UK Association of Letting Agents, and the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
None of whom have been supporters of the scheme, according to Chris Norris, director of policy and practice at another panel member – the National Landlords Association.
Speaking last year to PublicTechnology sister publication Civil Service World, he said: “We have been – sceptical would be too light a word – very concerned about Right to Rent. Frankly, I don’t think there’s anybody around the table that likes the policy.”
Nine months into his post as the UK’s data watchdog, John Edwards tells PublicTechnology that he wants to reach all parts of the citizenry
Ministry of Defence and Home Office are among those reprimanded over major backlogs that caused ‘significant distress’ to individuals. PublicTechnology finds out more.
Communications regulator will examine whether the current market conditions stymie innovation and opportunities for smaller players
Cabinet Office accepts recommendations of review calling for greater transparency and more protections for those requesting information