Review to examine whether UK electoral laws are fit for digital age
The Committee on Standards in Public Life claims that online campaigning has ‘transformed the way parties engage with voters’
The UK’s electoral laws are due for a shake-up after calls for them to be brought into the digital age.
A review is being set up the Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) which will look into campaign expenditure, regulation and enforcement by the Electoral Commission, police and prosecutors.
The CSPL last substantively reviewed the Electoral Commission in 2007, and said since then “digital campaigning has transformed the way in which parties and campaigners engage with voters, creating challenges for the regulation of election and referendum campaigns”.
It added: “With the Electoral Commission approaching its twentieth anniversary, the CSPL believes the time is right to return its focus to the regulator.”
The inquiry will have three aspects; to look at whether the Electoral Commission has the powers it needs to be a robust regulator of election finance in the 21st century.
To assess both the civil sanctions and criminal prosecution regime and whether they work to deter and sanction breaches of election finance laws. And to examine the different regimes for party and candidate finance laws and consider if they should be put into a single framework.
The CSPL say matters relating to the arrangements for funding political parties will not be looked into, as this review is about the regulation of election finance. But the committee will at foreign donations in elections through the mechanism of funding adverts on digital and social media platforms.
And they will not be looking into the “fairness” of the Brexit vote, saying they do “not consider individual cases and will not be looking at previous referendums or elections”.
There is a public consultation open for submissions until 5pm on 31 July, and the CSPL will hold a series of meetings with political parties, campaign groups, parliamentary bodies, law enforcement, academics and think tanks.
The review is expected to run for approximately 12 months, and the report will be presented to the prime minister and published on the committee’s website in June next year.
Announcing the review, CSPL chair Lord Evans said: “Our review will look at what the regulation of election finance should achieve and how it is regulated. That will involve examining the Electoral Commission’s role as a regulator of election finance, along with the work of the police and CPS in this area. We intend to look at electoral regulation from first principles – what really matters in this area? What values and principles should guide regulation of finance during elections?”
A spokesperson for the Electoral Commission said: “The review launched by the Committee on Standards in Public Life is a welcome look at the regulatory framework on election finance, enforced by the Commission, the police and the courts. This framework ensures the integrity and transparency of democracy and political finance are maintained in the UK, and underpins public confidence in our democratic process.
“Since the current regulatory regime was established in 2000, the nature of campaigning at elections and referendums has changed; the use of digital campaigning techniques is significant and electoral laws are struggling to keep pace. This makes CSPL’s work even more timely and valuable. We look forward to engaging with the Committee on this review, and to discussing how the framework can be updated to strengthen financial regulation and deliver greater voter confidence.”
"Britain’s analogue-age campaign rules... allow for unscrupulous individuals to pay for anonymous ‘dark’ ads online, or pump out disinformation during election periods to sway the result. We need to bring our electoral law into the digital age – and put voters first."
Darren Hughes, Electoral Reform Society
The Electoral Reform Society have repeatedly taken aim at what it sees as major loopholes in the legislation, such as a lack of real-time donation reporting and the fact parties are not required to break down their social media spend. The campaign group say there is a “near-total lack of regulation of online political advertising”, and no single national database of online ads.
Darren Hughes, chief executive of the society, told PublicTechnology sister publication PoliticsHome: “It’s clear there are major gaps in our electoral law that are putting democracy at risk. Loopholes in Britain’s analogue-age campaign rules mean that donors based in foreign tax havens, or operating through untraceable shell companies can pump in money to influence our political parties.
He added: “Others allow for unscrupulous individuals to pay for anonymous ‘dark’ ads online, or pump out disinformation during election periods to sway the result. We need to bring our electoral law into the digital age – and put voters first. The committee is right to investigate this. As the chair notes, digital campaigning has ‘revolutionised the way parties and campaigners engage with voters’. But the legislation has remained 20 years out of date.”
The CSPL is an advisory non-departmental public body which offers the prime minister guidance on ethical standards across the whole of public life in England. It is chaired by Lord Evans, and includes senior MPs such as Labour’s Dame Margaret Beckett and Tory former Cabinet minister Jeremy Wright, as well as lay members.
Head of Test and Trace programme Baroness Harding says she does not want to specify a timeframe as projects often do not ‘run in a smooth way’
Cabinet Office minister said that, despite the controversy that often surrounds the PM’s top adviser, ‘people are interested in Dominic and his ideas’
Minister discusses need for new training campus and greater use of data in evaluation of projects
Experts discuss what the lasting impact of the pandemic might be for government and the public sector
PublicTechnology talks to Rich Turner about why organisations need to adopt a ‘risk-based approach’ to security – but first make sure they get the basics right
HPE shows why organisations are increasingly seeking to understand and consider the environmental impacts of their IT purchasing decisions