'New funding models required' for smart cities

Written by Colin Marrs on 31 May 2017 in News
News

Report highlights challenges for public sector in encouraging private investment into smart city technologies.

Private sector appetite to invest in smart city technology - Photo credit: Fotolia

City governments should consider launching focused municipal bonds to fund smart city infrastructure, according to a new report.

A study by consultancy Deloitte’s Center for Government Insights, said that the public sector needs to capture an appetite for investment from the private sector.

Focused mainly on US case studies, the report said that investing in smart cities programs requires creative thinking that departs from traditional models of infrastructure finance.

“As a first step, this includes supporting policies such as fiscal incentives (including tax abatements), PPPs, and qualified infrastructure bonds specifically focused on smart city requirements,” the report said.

In addition, performance-based approaches for revenue sharing should be built into delivery models for smart city systems, according to the authors.

This would see “the public procurer of services and the private-sector investors share in the value of efficiency gains in service delivery, advertising-generated income, and revenue from value-added analytics services”.

A third factor crucial to the success of funding smart city projects is active collaboration between central and local government, Deloitte said.

“This includes the potential to fund special-purpose vehicles and align on potential innovation districts within major metropolitan areas (even military bases),” the report said.

Emerging case studies show that the private sector is willing to invest in pilot projects as an up-front investment or loss leader, “but will expect to participate in longer-term upside and downstream implementation opportunities,” the report went on.

Key challenges to new funding models include the nature of existing procurement rules and the legal or regulatory framework adjustments that are required to assure any conflicts of interest are managed in a manner appropriate to the new model of risk allocation; the flexibility, interoperability, and longevity of new smart city systems, (both in terms of technology platform and across departments and agencies); and a movement to managed, cloud-based services and the associated privacy and cybersecurity risk management requirements.

Share this page

Tags

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

Vasco Gonçalves (not verified)

Submitted on 8 June, 2017 - 08:51
This is what EVA Smart City, which will be built in the European Union (EU) or the European Economic Area ( EEA ), has in plans. A special fund will be created for this purpose. These investors, i.e. common people and private businesses, also have a priority to buy or to lease premises in that city (see my articles on LinkedIn: http://bit.ly/2hXsmcS ).

Related Articles

MHCLG digital chief: ‘I want us to be proud plumbers’
24 May 2018

Paul Maltby claims councils must first renew ageing infrastructure before realising the benefits of machine learning and automation 

Serious Fraud Office uses artificial intelligence to crack real crimes
22 June 2018

Chief technology officer Ben Denison discusses how the organisation is using technology to get on top of increasingly vast and complex cases of bribery, fraud, and corruption

Related Sponsored Articles

Don’t Gamble with your password resets!
20 June 2018

The cautionary tale of the Leicestershire teenager who hacked high-ranking officials of NATO allies shows the need for improved password security

5 minutes with an ethical hacker
4 June 2018

BT's Konstantinos Karagiannis explains ethical hacking and why it's important to exploit vulnerabilities