National Archives to digitise 1921 census records

Written by Sam Trendall on 11 January 2018 in News
News

Agency seeks supplier to facilitate online publication of information gathered through national survey as it nears 100-year cut-off

Details of the lives of the Londoners in this picture from the early 1920s could soon be published online  Credit: Leonard Bentley/CC BY-SA 2.0

The National Archives is seeking a commercial partner to help it digitise data from the 1921 census of England and Wales.

The project will require the chosen supplier “to digitise, transcribe, and publish online” records from the decennial national census that was conducted 97 years ago. The archive, a non-ministerial government department housed within the remit of the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, is seeking a provider that can deliver digital image capture, and transcribe text data in a way that permits people to conduct “meaningful searches” of the records.

The census, which was the first to be conducted following the introduction of the Census Act of 1920. As such, the information it holds is typically considered to be subject to the non-statutory '100-year rule', preventing publication for 100 years on grounds of confidentiality. 

The records can be published from January 2022 at the earliest. The National Archives is looking for a supplier to begin digitisation work in May of this year and plans to award the chosen company a 10-year contract.


Related content


Potential suppliers must demonstrate their credentials in three key areas, the first being “experience of managing and completing large-scale digitisation projects of heritage material”. The second is evidence of prior work delivering “online publication of heritage material specifically for use by the family-history market”. 

In return for conducting for the digitisation project, the chosen supplier will be given rights to publish online images and transcribed text under the terms of a commercial licence to be granted by The National Archives. In which regard, the third requirement the agency is asking of a supplier for this project is evidence that the company has previously developed “viable commercial models that return an income stream to licensor partners”. 

The licensor, in this case, will be The National Archives. The organisation has, for some time, run digitisation projects by allowing genealogy websites and other external entities to digitise its records – at their own expense. The digitised records, which suppliers are permitted to publish under licence, are then provided back to The National Archives, who retain the copyright, and can earn royalties for use of the records by other companies.

Speaking to PublicTechnology last year, The National Archives digital director John Sheridan said: “It creates a really sustainable model of digitising the records –  and we are not spending any of our money on digitising the collection. We have a model that works particularly well for large-scale digitisation – we are doing that through our partners.”

Suppliers have until 8 February to bid for the project to digitise the 1921 census, with a contract scheduled to start on 31 May.

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

Fiona Gayther (not verified)

Submitted on 13 January, 2018 - 14:07
I sincerely hope that the contract is not awarded to Findmypast as last time the profiteering by them was terrible. Please give it to Ancestry who are much fairer.

David Tomlinson (not verified)

Submitted on 16 January, 2018 - 11:50
There need to be standards for accuracy in the transcription of the data and some standards for consistency in the presentation of the information. In the 1939 Register records I have searched several thousands and have yet to find a record without some kind of error. There are many addresses which cannot be found using the address search even using the address actually found on the individual transcript. Many errors in the transcriptions relate to simple misunderstandings of the historical context of the records.

Related Articles

Voice activation, service transformation, and deliberately delayed mortgages – six things we learned at Sprint 18
11 May 2018

The relaunched annual GDS event shone a light on the government’s key digital-transformation strategies and initiatives for the coming months and years. PublicTechnology went along to...

Liam Maxwell: ‘Transformation is nothing to do with tech – it is about a change of business model’
15 June 2018

Government's national technology adviser discusses why getting digital reforms through the machinery of government may require some help from Jason Bourne

 

Collaboration, data, connectivity, skills, and ethics – London CDO previews five core policy areas of smart-city plan
31 May 2018

Theo Blackwell discusses how the soon-to-be-published Smarter London Together strategy document will promote common standards and skills, and help councils use planning powers to promote...

Related Sponsored Articles

Don’t Gamble with your password resets!
20 June 2018

The cautionary tale of the Leicestershire teenager who hacked high-ranking officials of NATO allies shows the need for improved password security

5 minutes with an ethical hacker
4 June 2018

BT's Konstantinos Karagiannis explains ethical hacking and why it's important to exploit vulnerabilities