GDS reviews GOV.UK exemptions
As government’s online infrastructure becomes more sophisticated, digital agency says there is ‘less of a case’ for organisations to use alternative platforms
Credit: Crown Copyright/Open Government Licence v3.0
The Government Digital Service is to review exemptions that have been granted for central-government organisations to host their online content outside of the GOV.UK infrastructure.
Since launching in 2012, the GDS-developed GOV.UK platform has been the default location for the websites of all central government organisations. Content and services across the site operate on standardised common tools, and any department or other public body wishing to use a different platform must first apply for an exemption to do so.
GDS has recently updated the ‘GOV.UK Proposition’, which provides guidance on what content should and should not be hosted on the website, and on the use of domains.
According to the digital agency, the guidance has been amended, in part, to “reflect the broad range of content and services that are now offered through GOV.UK”.
This includes “campaign activity and raising awareness, reflecting GOV.UK’s role in providing key information and access to services during major national events”.
Although exemptions can still be applied for, the increased breadth in services and content offered through GOV.UK means that it may be harder for departments to make a case that they would be better served by an alternative platform.
Related content
- GDS introduces algorithmic ‘related content’ links to GOV.UK
- Number of GOV.UK domains rises for first time since launch
- GDS to audit all GOV.UK pages by 2020
"While the qualifying requirements are now more stringent, we’ve kept the exemption process for content and services that either fall outside the GOV.UK remit, or where user needs would be better met off GOV.UK,” GDS said, in a blog post. “As GOV.UK continues to develop and provide greater functionality there will be less of a case for exemptions from the site.”
GDS will examine existing exemptions and, if necessary, ask the organisation in question to move their website back onto GOV.UK infrastructure.
“We’re also reviewing the exemptions we’ve granted in the past against the updated proposition,” the digital agency said. “This will give us a clearer view of what should be on the platform and whether sites and services currently operating separately from GOV.UK would be better met through GOV.UK. Where these sites and services can move to GOV.UK, we will support them in making the transition. Moving forward, we want more government’s digital activity to be on GOV.UK.”
Updates made to the GOV.UK Proposition include combining advice on exemptions with guidance on what content is required to be hosted the platform.
“Putting these into a single document makes the guidance easier to follow,” GDS said.
Other changes include the addition of a list of domains – such as campaign.gov.uk and service.gov.uk – that collectively constitute the GOV.UK website.
Additional information also has been provided on the kind of content that should not be included on the government platform, “such as party-political content, advertising, and anything that doesn’t support commercial neutrality”.
Share this page
Tags
Categories
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS
Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.
Related Articles
PublicTechnology editor Sam Trendall picks out the big issues that might shape the year ahead. Apart from that one.
UK’s top two civil servants should be handed more responsibility as part of drive to make Cabinet Office more effective, says IfG
Public Accounts Committee points to need for more funding and legislative changes
Chief executive Julie Lennard on the role of tech in responding to the pandemic, and how people’s expectations of online tools have changed
Related Sponsored Articles
In 2020 public sector organisations have been tested to a degree never experienced before. According to CrowdStrike, increasing cybersecurity attacks are an additional complication they must...
The remote-first world has seen email being relied on more than ever as a core communication mechanism - but with 93% of IT leaders acknowledging a risk to sensitive data, what steps should be...
2020 was a cyber security wake up call for many organisations. Attempting to provide secure remote access and device flexibility quickly exposed the flaws in legacy systems and processes. As we...
One Trust breaks down the modular approach of the new SCCs