Ethics watchdog to examine use of AI in public services

Written by Beckie Smith on 28 March 2019 in News
News

Committee on Standards in Public Life to conduct review of moral and technical issues facing use of new technology

The government’s public standards watchdog has announced a review of the use of artificial intelligence in public services.

The inquiry will look at how the increasing uptake of “technologically assisted decision-making” in the public sector is affecting service delivery, and whether existing regulations are sufficient to ensure standards are being upheld, the Committee on Standards in Public Life said this week.

It will examine how autonomous systems are being used to make decisions or solve problems that would otherwise require human intervention. This includes the use of algorithms in decision-making, which is the subject of a separate investigation announced last week by the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation and the Cabinet Office’s Race Disparity Unit.

The committee’s review will examine public bodies’ adoption of new technologies, with a focus on the application of the standards embodied in the “seven principles of public life” – commonly known as the Nolan principles – which apply to all public sector employees. The Nolan principles are: honesty; integrity; objectivity; openness; leadership; selflessness; and accountability. 

The non-departmental public body – the purpose of which is to advise serving prime ministers on ethical standard throughout public life – will also consider whether it is appropriate or in the public interest to use AI-assisted decision-making in particular contexts.


Related content


Announcing the review, committee chair Lord Jonathan Evans said the Nolan principles had “stood the test of time” and had been adopted throughout the civil service and public bodies such as NHS trusts and local councils. “The increasing development and use of data and data-enabled technologies in our public services can potentially bring huge advantages in terms of pace and scale of service delivery," he said.

"But there are some major ethical and practical challenges about what this means for accountability, objectivity and the other Nolan principles."

Based on its inquiry, the committee will produce a set of recommendations to ensure public bodies maintain high standards in AI-assisted services and decision-making. It may put forward guidance on best practice or suggest changes to regulations.

The committee is seeking written submissions from individuals and organisations involved in developing policy, systems or safeguards on the use of AI. It is expected to report on its findings early next year.

This review will be among the first major pieces of work the committee has carried out since former MI5 boss Lord Jonathan Evans took up the role of chair last year.

During a pre-appointment hearing for the role in October, Evans said he would not shy away from the criticising the government should his position call for it.

He also said he wanted civil servants to be given the authority to assess risks and make informed judgements on contentious issues, rather than unthinkingly following established processes.

“If you pile bureaucratic process on bureaucratic process then the whole thing becomes a rather deadening compliance exercise,” he told the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee. “Where you are in uncharted territory or where there is an ambiguity, I feel it is much better if people feel a sense of responsibility to do the right thing."

 

About the author

Beckie Smith is a reporter for PublicTechnology sister publication Civil Service Worldwhere a version of this story first appeared. She tweets as @Beckie__Smith

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Letter from Australia: how the government got serious on cybersecurity
10 July 2020

CyberArk, our sponsor for PublicTechnology Cyber Week, writes about how industry and government are working together to meet Australia’s cyber challenges

How secure is government and should we have a right to know?
8 July 2020

In a lengthy attempt to find out about the security of government’s software systems, PublicTechnology finds a very uneven approach to transparency and what constitutes sensitive...

How Brexit Britain could become a surveillance state
8 July 2020

The UK has tended to only introduce data-protection laws in conjunction with EU legislation and, according to Ray Walsh from ProPrivacy, the post-Brexit world may see the country prioritise...

How big is the UK’s cyber skills gap?
7 July 2020

A major government-commissioned study found that about half of UK organisations are lacking basic security skills. PublicTechnology talks to the researchers behind it to find out where...

Related Sponsored Articles

Interview: CyberArk EMEA chief on how government has become a security leader
29 May 2020

PublicTechnology talks to Rich Turner about why organisations need to adopt a ‘risk-based approach’ to security – but first make sure they get the basics right

Accelerating sustainability in the age of disruption
21 May 2020

HPE shows why organisations are increasingly seeking to understand and consider the environmental impacts of their IT purchasing decisions