Could the Lords be the testing ground for the future of virtual parliament?

Written by Sam Trendall on 19 May 2021 in News
News

Crossbench peer Lord Anderson argues that the upper chamber should experiment further with virtual proceedings

Credit: PA

The House of Lords should experiment further with virtual and hybrid models of parliament, a crossbench peer has claimed.

Lord David Anderson, a life peer and a member of the EU Security and Justice Sub-Committee, believes that, to truly understand the efficacy of remote and technology-enabled models of parliament and the role they could play in the future, these need to be tested in “normal conditions”.

In the last year, parliamentary business – particularly the operations of select committees – has come to make extensive use of videoconferencing and other remote-access technologies. 

Writing exclusively for PublicTechnology sister publication The House, Anderson said that his experience in recent months of both committee investigations and debates in the chamber had shown the power of technology.


Related content


“Moving from a traditional select committee to one created only in April 2020 certainly opened my eyes,” he said. “Ministers were quizzed by Zoom, their reactions just as visible as they would have been from the other end of a horseshoe table. Simultaneous Teams chats allowed supplementary questions to be proposed, refined and allocated as evidence was given. By the autumn, peers who had never physically met had developed an unexpected esprit de corps. It was no surprise when the Lords Constitution Committee recommended that the virtual functioning of committees should be allowed to continue.”

Anderson added: “In the chamber, speakers appearing remotely are clearly seen and heard: as a bonus, one is never reduced to looking at the backs of their heads. The upper house may not be renowned for spontaneity, but virtual speakers respond just as well as physical ones to what they have heard in debate.”

The House of Commons has made similar use of tech during the past year – and has not ruled out more longer-lasting changes to its operations – but is set to return to its pre-pandemic ways in the meantime.

This being the case, Anderson said that the Lords should continue using the technological methods it has relied on throughout the coronavirus crisis, to better understand what role they can play in the future.

“We need experience of hybrid proceedings in normal conditions before deciding how to proceed in the long term,” he said. “Useful technical refinements may yet emerge – for example... to facilitate interventions on speakers in debate. We should adopt them if so. In other respects, let us continue as we are until we have the evidence to decide – on the excellent voting app PeerHub – the optimum procedure for our revising chamber in a non-pandemic world.”

 

Click here to read Lord Anderson’s full piece for The House.

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

IPA chief on how government and industry need to collaborate to transform
19 December 2022

Nick Smallwood runs the rule over major projects’ progress in 2022, and looks to the year ahead

Whitehall digitisation hampered by 30 years of ‘over-optimism’
14 December 2022

NAO chief Gareth Davies says that government needs to invest in tech to achieve efficiencies

Newham picks former Microsoft and HSBC exec for new digital leadership post
31 January 2023

London borough creates tech-centric assistant CEO role to drive service transformation

Government will try to protect digital roles in civil service job cuts, according to Whitehall chief
30 January 2023

Civil service chief operating officer cites technology and commercial professions as among those where more skills are needed