Education institutions north of the border have been issued with an advisory document that provides insights on the possible benefits of new technology, as well as the potential risks involved

New guidance has been produced to support teachers and pupils to use artificial intelligence safely in Scotland’s schools.

Developed by the Scottish Government in conjunction with the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union, it provides information on the potential benefits of using AI as well as the possible complications and difficulties of doing so.

The document is divided into seven defined sections, respectively covering: core principles of AI in education and guardrails; frequently asked questions; checklist and exemplification; data protection; definitions; key ethical considerations; and resources.

Related content

• DfE seeks partner for development of AI-powered tutoring tools for disadvantaged students
• DfE signs potential £60m digital deals to support major schools programmes
• DfE reveals use ChatGPT-based tool to draft citizen email responses

The first of these segments enshrines five principles for schools follow, beginning with a tenet that “AI use must ensure the safety and privacy of children and young people and staff”. The next two principles stipulate that the use of “AI must be underpinned by equity and fairness”, and that it “must support the aims of the curriculum”.

The final two maxims advise that AI tools should “foster human connection and inclusivity” and that it “must support teachers”.

Scottish Government education secretary Jenny Gilruth said: “AI is increasingly part of all our lives, and we have a responsibility to ensure children, young people, and teachers are equipped to grasp its opportunities and navigate its challenges. It is important that human relationships remain at the heart of education, and I am absolutely clear that technology will never replace the role of the teacher. This guidance makes clear that AI must enhance, not replace, those connections.”

The guidance has not been put on a statutory footing.