Is Matt Hancock forcing online regulation by the back door?

The unilateral decision to compel social media companies to work with charities on harmful content has not been subjected to the necessary scrutiny, believes tech policy expert Heather Burns

Credit: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/PA Images

In a move which raises questions about government attempts to bypass consultative scrutiny, the health secretary Matt Hancock has announced the appointment of the Samaritans as the private regulator to define and evaluate online harms, despite the government’s white paper on online harms, and its regulatory structure, still being open for consultation.

The announcement was the result of previously announced talks held in Whitehall with representatives from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pinterest, and Google. Wikipedia was also summoned to attend, despite being neither a social media platform nor a private company with employees, and thus having no one capable of attending.

Reports indicate that the social media companies in attendance have been compelled to contribute several hundreds of thousands of pounds in research funding to the Samaritans, the suicide-prevention charity. 

These funds will enable them to develop an online-harms equivalent of its well-known guidelines for the media on the reporting of suicide. The eating disorder charity Beat will be tapped in a similar role for pro-anorexia and -bulimia material. Social media companies, in turn, will be expected to adopt the ensuing codes in their terms of service as part of their “duty of care” to users.

The announcement of the Samaritans initiative was made in the context of the government’s focus on online harms, specifically its white paper laying out the model for the proposed definitions of online harms, the scope of the proposed duty of care, and the identity and structure of the proposed independent regulator. 

The white paper, however, remains open for consultation until 1 July.

In parliament on Tuesday, Matt Hancock noted that “compliance with this duty of care will be overseen and enforced by an independent regulator, which will be responsible for producing codes of practice that will explain what companies need to do to fulfil their duty, and the robust action they need to take to remove illegal or harmful content”.

Yet speaking in the Telegraph, Hancock (pictured above) said: “we have an independent body like the Samaritans that are funded to be able to be arbiter of what should and shouldn’t be taken down”. 

This is a very different line to the one delivered in parliament. 

While nothing proposed in the white paper has been decided or finalised, the Samaritans’ role has been announced as if the consultation is closed, the definitions are finalised, the regulator is operative, and the duty of care is law. 

These unilateral decisions on the regulation of online harms are neither consultative nor open to public scrutiny. Furthermore, another open consultation dealing directly with children’s use of the internet – ICO’s draft code of practice on age-appropriate design – was not even mentioned, despite being directly relevant to the prevention of online harms as well as social media companies’ role in managing them.

In announcing a private charity as the judge and jury of online harms, the health secretary has, effectively, bypassed both the white paper consultation and the rule of law, hiding behind ‘won’t someone think of the children?’ to do so. 

A questionable track record
The Samaritans have been tapped as the arbiter of online harms despite having a questionable track record. The charity, for all its good works and intentions, was responsible for one of the most notorious experiments in failed online moderation of suicidal behavior. 

Its Samaritans Radar app, launched in 2014, scanned Twitter for phrases which could indicate suicidal ideation such as “help me”. The app then sent an email to the users’ friends indicating that they might be in need of help. In theory, Samaritans Radar would leverage the power of social media to create a safety net for the vulnerable. In practice, the app infringed personal privacy, scanned conversations without user consent, made potentially catastrophic judgements based on artificial intelligence, and handed a gift to bullies and trolls seeking vulnerable people to attack. The app was pulled after just nine days of existence.

Yet five years later, an offer to create automated solutions based on proactive monitoring, potentially flawed artificial intelligence, and intrusive intervention is just what the health secretary ordered.

Finally, the announcement of the Samaritans’ role in domestic tech regulation by Hancock also raises the intriguing question of why the former DCMS minister effectively continues in post despite having left that brief in January 2018. 

While the health secretary’s love of all things technical and gadgety is as notorious as the current postholders’ distaste for them, the complete absence of the ministers for DCMS, Jeremy Wright, and digital, Margot James, from a public announcement about tech sector regulation raises questions about their commitment to their portfolios.

 

Sam Trendall

Learn More →

31 thoughts on “Is Matt Hancock forcing online regulation by the back door?

  1. Anastasiya Kvitko Telegram Channel October 4, 2024 at 5:14 pm

    Daalischus Rose Only Fans Leaks

  2. Bishoujo Mom Telegram Channel October 5, 2024 at 1:17 am

    Belle Delphine Only Fans Leaks

  3. Nu.Ski Titties October 5, 2024 at 5:55 am

    Nu.Ski Naked

  4. NuSki Sextape Leaks October 5, 2024 at 8:24 am

    NuSki Only Fans Leaks – https://t.me/NuSkiLeaks

  5. Rubi Rose Telegram Channel October 5, 2024 at 8:34 am

    Rubi Rose Only Fans Leaks

  6. Belle Delphine Telegram Channel October 5, 2024 at 5:01 pm

    Bishoujo Mom Only Fans Leaks

  7. NuSki Leaks Telegram Channel October 5, 2024 at 7:26 pm

    NuSki Sextape Leaks

  8. Kyle Sister Telegram Channel October 6, 2024 at 1:04 am

    Amouranth Only Fans Leaks

  9. NuSki Nudes Leaked October 6, 2024 at 10:29 am

    Nu.Ski Nude Leaks – https://t.me/NuSkiLeaks

  10. Kyle Sister Telegram Channel October 6, 2024 at 1:39 pm

    Adore Keya Only Fans Leaks

  11. Adore Keya Telegram Channel October 6, 2024 at 5:57 pm

    Kyle Sister Only Fans Leaks

  12. Pretty Brown Meme Telegram Channel October 7, 2024 at 11:49 pm

    Rubi Rose Only Fans Leaks

  13. Nu.Ski Naked October 8, 2024 at 12:22 am

    NuSki Nudes Leaked

  14. Glo Kashy Telegram Channel October 8, 2024 at 12:53 am

    Bishoujo Mom Only Fans Leaks

  15. Nu.Ski Nude Leaks October 8, 2024 at 5:45 am

    Nu.Ski OnlyFans

  16. Mikayla Saravia Only Fans Leaks October 9, 2024 at 7:17 am

    Angela In College Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  17. Haley Nicole Only Fans Leaks October 9, 2024 at 8:37 am

    Jailyne Ojeda Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  18. Power Midget Only Fans Leaks October 9, 2024 at 10:26 am

    Faith Lianne Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  19. KKVSH Only Fans Leaks October 9, 2024 at 12:26 pm

    Jailyne Ojeda Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  20. Pretty Brown Meme Only Fans Leaks October 11, 2024 at 1:29 pm

    Rubi Rose Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  21. Angela In College Only Fans Leaks October 11, 2024 at 3:41 pm

    Viet Bunny Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  22. Mikaila Dancer Only Fans Leaks October 11, 2024 at 4:42 pm

    Jenise Hart Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  23. Pretty Brown Meme Only Fans Leaks October 12, 2024 at 11:12 am

    The Bum Bum Queen Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  24. Rubi Rose Only Fans Leaks October 12, 2024 at 6:38 pm

    Bombshell Mint Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  25. Gracie Bon Only Fans Leaks October 12, 2024 at 7:15 pm

    Power Midget Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  26. GG With The WAP Only Fans Leaks October 12, 2024 at 10:18 pm

    Jenise Hart Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  27. Saffron XX Rose Only Fans Leaks October 13, 2024 at 3:25 am

    Rubi Rose Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  28. iTz Grippy Only Fans Leaks October 13, 2024 at 4:11 am

    Leah Mifsud Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  29. Gracie Bon Only Fans Leaks October 13, 2024 at 4:56 am

    iTz Grippy Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  30. Boriqua Mami Only Fans Leaks October 13, 2024 at 9:55 am

    GG With The WAP Only Fans Mega Link Folder

  31. The Bum Bum Queen Only Fans Leaks October 13, 2024 at 1:06 pm

    Emmanuel Lustin Only Fans Mega Link Folder

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Processing...
Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.
Newsletter Signup
Receive the top stories from the UK’s leading public sector digital and data publication direct to your inbox every lunchtime.
ErrorHere