Ministry of Justice sets minimum security standards for AWS

Written by PublicTechnology staff on 17 June 2019 in News
News

Users of S3 storage warned against allowing public access, to tackle ‘leaky bucket’ risk

The Ministry of Justice has published security guidelines for its more than 120 Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing accounts, designed to provide a “lowest common denominator” for security settings.

“We wanted to set the baseline at a good level, while catering for diverse architectures and applications, without creating unreasonable high-effort tasks for teams but ensuring we avoid common bad practice missteps,” according to newly published blogpost from senior security engineer Siddharthan Elangovan and Joel Samuel, a cybersecurity consultant working with the ministry.

They identified “S3 leaky bucket” as a common problem, referring to AWS’s Simple Storage Service (S3) which provides ‘buckets’ of online space for files, from which many organisations have suffered leaks due to poor configuration. The baseline bars users for making S3 buckets ‘world’ – meaning publicly – readable unless this is the specific intention. Usage is monitored centrally and the ministry will automatically remove ‘world’ access after a warning. Similar requirements are in place for AWS Compute services.


Related content


The baseline requirements also insist on use of GuardDuty, CloudTrail and Config, AWS’s threat detection, user tracking and configuration auditing services, on all accounts at all times. They also require all AWS objects to be tagged for ownership.

Users are banned from using resources outside the EU, and the service’s Identity and Access Management service must be used, with alerts when new accounts are created and idle ones suspended. When encryption is offered by AWS for a service, it must be enabled.

Elangovan and Samuel said that further security may be appropriate in some cases. “The baseline is our current minimum security posture for our MOJ AWS accounts – not what we think is a gold standard,” they wrote. “This helps set a bar but gives teams latitude for doing things differently when they need to.”

Research for PublicTechnology published in May found that the ministry was responsible for far more breaches of personal data than any other department, recording 3,184 in 2017-18.

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Cyber Week: what now for the UK’s data-protection regime?
16 July 2021

The EU may have granted its former member state adequacy, but there will be many more issues to resolve in the coming years

‘Location is no longer an arbiter of trust’ – what the future of work means for security
15 July 2021

PublicTechnology catches up with Richard Meeus from Akamai to discuss how the events of the past year have changed not only how organisations work, but how they protect their workforce...

The stigma needs to be removed from cyberattacks
13 July 2021

The secrecy and shame associated with cyber incidents needs to be rethought, believes PublicTechnology editor Sam Trendall

Related Sponsored Articles

Social justice: how the police can embrace online channels of citizen communication
17 June 2021

PublicTechnology talks to Salesforce about why police forces need to adopt new omnichannel capabilities, offer the public channel choice and the benefits of doing so

"The inflection point is here": how Covid is driving digital transformation in health
9 June 2021

It’s been one of the most challenging years for healthcare providers, but Salesforce sees lasting change from accelerated digital transformation