Information commissioner warns MPs of risks of absolving agencies of transparency requirements
Credit: Arek Socha/Pixabay
Information commissioner John Edwards has warned the government against exempting organisations from Freedom of Information requests.
When launching the Advanced Research and Invention Agency in February 2021, the government exempted the public body from answering all FoIs, claiming this would “cut inappropriate bureaucracy”.
Speaking to the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Edwards said: “I would not like to see that trend continue, I think that’s unhealthy…unnecessary and ultimately that would be counterproductive. We need to be vigilant in maintaining direction of travel towards increased transparency and avoid any temptation to slide back.”
Recently published annual government data revealed that, in 2022, the proportion of FoI requests to which public bodies supplied all requested information was supplied fell below 40% for the first time. HM Treasury, the Foreign Office, the Cabinet Office, Defra and the Department for Levelling Up all had a full-response rate of 25% or less.
The commissioner told MPs he had concerns about the use of FoI exemptions by departments, and called for greater transparency.
“While I’m eager to present a positive picture to the committee, I am not Pollyanna and there is still work to do,” he said. “I am disappointed that we don’t have greater clarity and consistency around the application of exemptions, for example in relation to policy advice. And, for me, that would be a challenge for the next level of maturity in transparency, that we are seeing more proactive publication of material which illuminates the workings of government.”
- How secure is government and should we have a right to know?
- ICO chief: ‘We are not ‘going easy’ on government‘
- CCS defends Digital Marketplace closure and pledges to ‘reinstate transparency’
Edwards said the ICO is working particularly closely with the Cabinet Office, which – as well as one of the lowest rates of providing information in full – receives the highest levels of FoI complaints against it.
“They have got a high volume, their cases are typically more complex, they often involve a range of other departments,” he said. “And the approach we have begun with them is that, they’ve drawn a line under the calendar and are dealing with all new matters in accordance with the statutory obligations. And we’ve had conversations with them about how we can work on that backlog and bring that down.”
Edwards also issued a warning on the potential consequences of failing to maintain the public record.
A recent update to Cabinet Office rules on the use of unofficial communication channels warned officials and ministers they must not use ‘disappearing messages’ functions in any way that impacts on their record-keeping or transparency responsibilities.
Asked what sort of sanction a minister could face for using such a function, Edwards said it was “a little perilous to speculate on hypotheticals” but warned that “there are criminal sanctions for failing to maintain a record or destroying a record”.
Edwards said the Cabinet Office guidance is “pretty clear that if it is government business conducted on a non-corporate communication channel it must be retained as part of the official record”.
“So no, they [ministers] shouldn’t be using disappearing messages in the conduct of government business,” Edwards added.
The debate over Whatsapp use in government has reignited in the past few weeks amid a dispute between the Cabinet Office and Covid Inquiry over the handing over former prime minister Boris Johnson’s messages.
In response to claims that senior officials, ministers and special advisers used WhatsApp to make key decisions during the Covid-19 pandemic, former health minister James Bethell said earlier this week that most messages were about coffee orders, not key decisions.
Referring to these comments, Edwards said “the frothiness of coffee” does not need to be forwarded to the record but “discussion setting up a meeting where a decision is to be made ought to”.
As part of the Cabinet Office rule-update, officials and ministers were also banned from using non-government communications platforms to conduct official business on anything above government’s lowest level of security classification.
Edwards said he thinks the changes go “some way towards” providing reassurance over transparency in government.
He said it is important that government business can benefit from new technologies that can improve efficiency but these developments should be supported by policies that “ensure the security of the data and the maintenance of the public record”.
The data watchdog warned in its 2022 Behind the Screens report that the rapid increase in the use of messaging apps and technologies like WhatsApp and the lack of controls might lead to important messages being lost.