The digital fight needs political might

Written by Sam Trendall on 18 June 2019 in Opinion
Opinion

The case for transformation could do with more high-profile Westminster backers, according to PublicTechnology editor Sam Trendall

Credit: Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

As I write, Matt Hancock has just withdrawn from the Tory leadership contest – thereby eliminating the possibility that the country’s next prime minister will be the first to have launched their own smartphone app.

This is a sad day for the electorate, to be sure.

But for all that Hancock – with his puppyish tech-evangelist shtick – is often cast as a figure of fun, he is one of the few national politicians who strongly and consistently advocates for the adoption of technology. And a lack of political backing is often the biggest barrier to the progress of government digital and data initiatives.

There is a common perception that, since its inception in 2011, one of the major difficulties faced by the Government Digital Service has been driving change and reform in departments that are often fiercely protective of their sovereignty. Another widely held view is that GDS’s ability to disrupt has waned over time, as its prior pugnacity has given way to a more pacific approach.

Such broad generalisations may be a touch facile, but they each contain at least a grain of truth. 

During my time in this job, I have asked a number of current and former civil servants about the criteria that define the extent to which GDS – and the wider Cabinet Office – is able to bend to its will departments that might be resistant to centrally driven initiatives. 

The same, succinct answer has invariably come back each time.

“Ministers.”

In any difference of opinion between the centre of government and one of its departments, the minister with the greater clout will always win the argument, I have repeatedly been told. 

For the entirety of the coalition government’s five-year administration – which saw the creation of GDS and the formation of the Crown Commercial Service – Francis Maude served as Cabinet Office minister.

Maude was first elected to parliament in 1983. While the Conservatives were in power he held ministerial posts in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Treasury. Later, while in opposition, he occupied a number of front-bench positions – including shadow chancellor and party chairman – and, in the lead-up to the 2010 election, was reportedly picked by David Cameron to lead a team dedicated to preparing the Conservatives to take power.

By the time they did so, Maude had accumulated significant political capital. During the closing act of a three-decade career, he seemingly chose to spend it on Whitehall reforms that appeared to represent something of a passion project. 

The former Horsham MP had both the will and, crucially, the ministerial muscle to help drive through and ensure the success of initiatives like the disaggregation of monolithic contracts, the creation of GOV.UK, and the introduction of G-Cloud and the Digital Marketplace.

Since Maude exited the House of Commons following the 2015 election, a succession of people have held ministerial responsibility for GDS and CCS. Until the current incumbent Oliver Dowden – who, at 18 months and counting, has been in post significant longer than any of his immediate predecessors – all have been passing through the Cabinet Office on their way up, down, or sideways. 

Some – including Dowden and Hancock, who was Cabinet Office minister straight after Maude – have seemed to embrace the cause of digital transformation. Others less so.

But none can match Maude’s political clout, accumulated over many years as a senior member of his party’s parliamentary wing. What is more, while Cameron counted his Cabinet Office minister as a close ally, Theresa May never seemed to have any real interest in technology or the government agencies dedicated to its furtherance. 

In the race to succeed her, some may have found it difficult to take Matt Hancock – both the man and the app – all that seriously.

Those dedicated to the digital transformation of government may worry that the ultimate winner of that race, and the ministers with whom they surround themselves, will fail to take them seriously.

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Minister praises GOV.UK response to Brexit
20 September 2019

Simon Hart says GDS has reacted quickly and effectively to impending EU exit

GDS boss looks to work closer with Treasury on project planning
20 September 2019

Alison Pritchard says organisation would like to be involved at an earlier stage of projects

'Designating services as digital is increasingly a hindrance' – DfE's Emma Stace on working across organisational boundaries
18 September 2019

As the Department for Education refashions itself as a delivery department, its chief digital officer Emma Stace tells PublicTechnology she is determined to make digital ‘just...

Related Sponsored Articles

The age of virtualisation
17 September 2019

After more than 20 years of stability, networks are going through a period of dramatic transformation. BT looks beyond the hype at the real benefits of virtualisation.

Digital Transformation: Connecting and protecting with perfect predictability
10 September 2019

How can you stay ahead in the fast-paced world of digital technology? BT describes how it's a matter of focus... 

How to stay ahead of a changing threat landscape
3 September 2019

The security threat landscape is confusing and changing rapidly – there’s so much out there, how do you understand where the true risks are? BT offers insight from their own experience

The cyber security skills challenge: Hiring for tomorrow
27 August 2019

Organisations must alter their approach to cyber security recruitment in order to combat the global shortage of security professionals, writes BT