Temps account for 98% of staff building £250m immigration platform

Written by Sam Trendall on 1 March 2019 in News
News

Minister reveals just eight out of 360 workers on Home Office project are civil servants

Just eight out of the 360 staff working on the construction of the government’s £250m immigration IT system are civil servants, it has emerged.

In a recent written parliamentary statement, immigration minister Caroline Nokes said that the other 352 people “working on the construction of the Immigration Platform Technologies programme” are classified as “contingent labour”.  This equates to 97.8% of the total workforce.

A further statement from minister for crime, safeguarding and vulnerability Victoria Atkins indicated that some of the roles staffed by the temps and contractors include programme managers, digital delivery managers, programme directors, and digital business designers. 

The Immigration Platform Technologies (IPT) programme was launched in 2014, shortly after the cancellation of the Immigration Case Work (ICW) programme to implement a new platform for processing immigration, visa, and asylum applications. According to a National Audit Office report published at the time, ICW was shut down by the Home Office “having achieved much less than planned, at a cost of £347m”. 


Related content


IPT – which was scheduled wrap up during the 2016/17 year and cost £208.7m – was designed to avoid the failures of the past by following an agile approach. 

“The Home Office IPT programme is building functionality to transform the way the Home Office manages immigration into the United Kingdom,” said commercial documents published at the launch of the project. “The system will be used by Home Office staff based in the UK and in consulates across the globe, and by all applicants for visa or immigration services.”

The scheme is replacing a legacy estate of five separate systems with one platform to manage all applications and subsequent case work. 

As of the most recently published annual report from the Infrastructure and Projects Authority, the scheme’s estimated whole-life cost had grown to £252.5m. The completion date had also been revised to 31 March 2019. For the second year in a row, the authority gave the project an amber rating.

According to the IPA’s traffic-light system, this means that: “Successful delivery appears feasible but significant issues already exist, requiring management attention. These appear resolvable at this stage and, if addressed promptly, should not present a cost/schedule overrun.”

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Policy on public sector use of US cloud under review as uncertainty grows over post-Brexit data transfers
21 September 2020

GDS and NHS Digital asked to review policies after collapse of Privacy Shield agreement and ongoing lack of data adequacy status with EU

The coronavirus ‘infodemic’: truth and conspiracy online
15 September 2020

The spread of online misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated a public health crisis. PublicTechnology digs into a recent parliamentary inquiry to find out...

Courts offer pre-recorded video cross-examination for vulnerable witnesses
26 August 2020

Service goes live in criminal trials throughout London and Kent and will be expanded across the country by the end of the year

Related Sponsored Articles

Intelligent Spend Management in the Public Sector
24 September 2020

SAP Concur says it's time for the public sector to embrace more efficient invoice management technology

Digital inclusion is vital during the COVID-19 accelerated channel shift
22 September 2020

Accessibility requirements aren’t restrictions that need to be overcome - they’re guidelines to improve online experiences for everyone, says Jadu VP Richard Friend

IT Resilience: The Key to a Successful Digital Transformation
22 September 2020

Steve Blow, tech evangelist at Zerto, explains why digital transformation efforts could be futile if local authorities don’t address and improve their IT resilience