Serco assents to £20m fine for fraud after probe into MoJ electronic tagging scandal
Company’s CEO says he is ‘mortified and angry’ about actions of predecessors
Credit: Ian Nicholson/PA Archive/PA Images
Outsourcer Serco has assented to fines and costs of more than £20m and admitted responsibility for three offences of fraud and two of false accounting related to its work to deliver an electronic tagging scheme on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.
The company has reached a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the Serious Fraud Office, which has come to the end of a six-year investigation into the matter. The arrangement will see Serco pay a fine of £19.2m, and reimburse the SFO for the £3.7m cost of its probe.
The agreement has been approved in principle by Mr Justice William Davis, who will sit today at Southwark Crown Court and hear the SFO’s application for final approval.
If this approval is given, it will signal the formal conclusion of the SFO’s investigation, with no criminal charges brought against Serco.
- Major outsourcers to build failure contingency plans into government contracts
- MoJ’s bungled tagging project hurt by needless ‘all-singing, all-dancing procurement approach’, PAC finds
- Serious Fraud Office uses artificial intelligence to crack real crimes
The offences in question, which are attributed to subsidiary Serco Geografix Limited (SGL), took place between 2010 and 2013. They relate to “a scheme to dishonestly mislead the MoJ as to the true extent of the profits being made” from Serco’s contract to provide electronic tagging and monitoring services.
The SFO said that the outsourcer deliberately misrepresented its profitability to try and prevent the MoJ using that information to reduce the value of the contract.
“SGL engaged in a concerted effort to lie to the Ministry of Justice in order to profit unlawfully at the expense of UK taxpayer,” said Serious Fraud Office director Lisa Osofsky. “The SFO will pursue those who engage in this sort of criminal conduct so that they are held to account.”
She added: “This resolution not only ensures such accountability, but also recognises SGL’s voluntary self-reporting of the misconduct, its and Serco Group’s substantial cooperation with our investigation, and Serco Group’s extensive corporate reform and other remediation. It also provides substantial assurances regarding the future corporate integrity of Serco Group, one of the UK’s largest government contractors.”
Serco claimed that the fine was half what it would otherwise have been, in recognition of the fact that it reported itself to the SFO.
The firm’s CEO Rupert Soames said: “Those of us who now run the business are mortified, embarrassed and angry that, in a period between six and nine years ago, Serco understated the level of profitability of its electronic monitoring contract in its reports to the Ministry of Justice. Serco apologised unreservedly at the time, and we do so again. Nobody who sat on the board of Serco Group, or who was part of the executive management team at the time these offences were committed, works for the group today.”
Serco has already paid a £70m settlement to the MoJ. The payment was made back in 2013, when it was first alleged that the company had charged the government for electronic tagging of people who were dead, in jail, or outside the UK.
NAO report finds that government drive had limited impact on public preparedness
Annual study from Institute for Government flags up patchy approach to transparency and ‘mixed’ progress on digital transformation
Cabinet secretary Sedwill says he ‘would like to see more processes handled’ by technology
The body dedicated to upholding ethical standards across the public sector has published a major report examining how to ensure those standards are not threatened by AI and automation