Regulator says coronavirus testing data ‘falls well short of expectations’
Head of statistics watchdog tells health secretary ‘it is not surprising data is widely criticised and mistrusted’
Credit: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire/PA Images
Figures on coronavirus testing released daily by the government are “far from complete and comprehensible”, the UK’s statistics watchdog has claimed.
In a letter to health secretary Matt Hancock, UK Statistics Authority chair Sir David Norgrove said the way data on testing is currently analysed and presented to the public gives “limited value”.
He said testing statistics “fall well short of expectations”, claiming “it is not surprising that, given their inadequacy, data on testing are so widely criticised and often mistrusted”.
“Statistics on testing perhaps serve two main purposes,” the letter stated. “The first is to help us understand the epidemic… showing us how many people are infected, or not, and their relevant characteristics. The second purpose is to help manage the test programme, to ensure there are enough tests, that they are carried out or sent where they are needed and that they are being used as effectively as possible. The data should tell the public how effectively the testing programme is being managed.”
- Test and trace scheme to keep citizens’ personal data for 20 years
- Website to book coronavirus tests temporarily closes after ‘significant demand’
- Government claims test and trace staff login issues ‘rapidly being resolved’
It added: “The way the data are analysed and presented currently gives them limited value for the first purpose. The aim seems to be to show the largest possible number of tests, even at the expense of understanding. It is also hard to believe the statistics work to support the testing programme itself. The statistics and analysis serve neither purpose well.”
Hancock told yesterday’s coronavirus briefing figures for the government’s new track and trace testing system are not yet available, but that it was "up and running" and had been successful so far.
The figures relating to the number of people tested – which stood at 128,437 on Monday – includes those posted as well as carried out.
Norgoves’s letter said: “The headline total of tests adds together tests carried out with tests posted out. This distinction is too often elided during the presentation at the daily press conference, where the relevant figure may misleadingly be described simply as the number of tests carried out. There are no data on how many of the tests posted out are, in fact, then successfully completed."
The authority said the way the figures are presented in general is “difficult to understand” and urged the government to make changes to ensure they are comprehensible to the public.
Norgrove welcomes the DHSC’s willingness to work with the Office for Statistics Regulation to discuss how the data and their presentation could be improved and gaps addressed. OSR will be happy to help further in any way they can.
“It would be useful to develop a published timetable for the changes that need to be made and for the development of the metrics for the vital new programme of Test and Trace,” he said. “I do understand the pressures that those concerned have faced and still face. But I am sure you would agree that good evidence, trusted by the public, is essential to success in containing the virus.”
Head of Test and Trace programme Baroness Harding says she does not want to specify a timeframe as projects often do not ‘run in a smooth way’
Cabinet Office advertises for cross-government positions
Experts discuss what the lasting impact of the pandemic might be for government and the public sector
The Joint Committee on Human Rights has drafted a bill designed to ensure users’ data is not misused
PublicTechnology talks to Rich Turner about why organisations need to adopt a ‘risk-based approach’ to security – but first make sure they get the basics right
CyberArk's David Higgins explores the cyber risks of hiring independent contractors
HPE shows why organisations are increasingly seeking to understand and consider the environmental impacts of their IT purchasing decisions