Public bodies encouraged to cancel contracts with Russian suppliers

Written by Beckie Smith on 30 March 2022 in News
News

Deals that could be under review include energy supply contacts and some tech consultancy engagements

Credit: Pxfuel 

Government departments have been told to consider cancelling any contracts they have with Russian or Belarusian suppliers in light of Russia's war on Ukraine.

Guidance issued by the Cabinet Office yesterday instructs public bodies to review their contract portfolios and identify any deals where the prime contractor is a Russian or Belarusian supplier. Having done so, they should consider terminating any such contracts.

There are significant constraints on when departments can cut contracts short, however.

Contract terminations must follow a legally compliant process, and can only go ahead if the department can find an alternative supplier “in line with value for money, affordability and with minimal disruption to public services”.

A search of archives on GOV.UK Contracts Finder reveals a smattering of technology-related deals awarded to companies whose office location is listed as Russia. This includes various market research or consultancy engagements related to foreign affairs, as well as contracts connected to the government’s diplomatic offices and activities in Russia.


Related content


The Russian government earlier this month put forward is own proposals intended to support the country’s IT sector and mitigate the impact on local tech firms of sanctions imposed by western governments.

The UK’s guidance includes a particular warning on ending contracts with energy suppliers – the area where the public sector is most exposed to Russian and Belarusian suppliers – because of fluctuating prices and the market’s volatility.

“You must seek advice from an energy expert and/or a relevant public sector buying organisation before taking action to terminate an existing energy supply contract to ensure an alternative source of supply is available and affordable,” the document says.

Meanwhile, departments must get Treasury approval before ending any transactions that “set precedents, are novel, contentious or could cause repercussions elsewhere in the public sector”, in line with the exchequer’s Managing Public Money guidance.

“In-scope organisations should take a proportionate and risk-based approach to reviewing their contract portfolio to identify Russian and Belarusian prime contractors,” the guidance, which applies to all central government departments, their executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies, says.

“The focus should be on major contracts and those which could have the most impact and influence on the Russian or Belarusian regimes,” it adds.

The guidance also notes that, while departments can opt to exclude bids from some Russian or Belarusian suppliers from new procurement processes, there are several instances where they cannot do so.

If the supplier – or any member of their supply chain – is registered in the UK or in a country the UK has a relevant international agreement with reciprocal rights of access to public procurement, they cannot be automatically excluded from a new procurement because this would contravene non-discrimination rules, the guidance says.

For the same reason, departments cannot automatically exclude suppliers that have “significant business operations in the UK or in a country the UK has a relevant international agreement with reciprocal rights of access to public procurement”.

“The government is supportive of public bodies seeking to divest from Russia and contracting authorities should consider how they can further cut ties with companies backed by, or linked to, the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, while minimising the impact to taxpayers and the delivery of public services,” the guidance says.

The document stresses the importance of taking a “proportionate” and “risk-based approach”.

“Contracts may be complex and take a period of time to exit from; you should ensure you prioritise and take action on the areas of the highest impact. The reasons for terminating a contract should be documented and transparent; the final decision to terminate a contract rests with the contracting authority with responsibility for the contract,” it adds.

Announcing the new guidance, Cabinet Office minister Steve Barclay said: “Public money should not fund Putin’s war machine. We are asking hospitals, councils and other organisations across the public sector to urgently look at all the ways they can go further to sever their commercial ties to Russia.

“The government will continue to work closely with these organisations, ensuring they are able to take the necessary steps as quickly as possible, including taking legal routes where necessary.”

 

About the author

Beckie Smith is deputy editor for PublicTechnology sister publication Civil Service World, where portions of this story first appeared. She tweets as @beckie__smith.

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Revealed: Cabinet Office signed deal last month for ‘immediate cyber incident response’
24 March 2022

Department directly awarded short-term deal to PwC but indicates there was no specific threat

Ransomware: Cabinet minister sounds alarm over ‘greatest cyberthreat to the UK’
16 May 2022

Steve Barclay urges greater reporting of attacks

Nuclear clean-up agency seeks £2m-a-year partner to help improve cyber-resilience
11 May 2022

Specialist firm sought to help identify areas where security could be bolstered

Big chill: Bank of England awards six-figure direct deal to cool datacentres at note-printing hub
10 May 2022

Contract for chillers at Essex site signed without competitive process