Parliament to continue to allow remote contributions

Written by Sam Trendall on 4 June 2020 in News
News

Government drops plan to require all MPs to attend the commons in person

SNP Commons leader Ian Blackford talks on a video screen during Prime Minister's questions    Credit: UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/PA Wire/PA Images

The government has dropped its plan to require all MPs to attend parliament if they wished to vote or participate in debates, and will continue to allow remote contributions from MPs that need to stay home for health reasons.

A motion to end the hybrid parliament and return to an entirely in-person system was due to be voted on by MPs yesterday. Even before it did so, the government had softened its proposals to allow for remote contributions via video link to reman in place “members unable to attend Westminster for medical and public health reasons related to the pandemic”.

The proposal that all votes must now be cast in person – rather than continuing with the electronic system that has been used in recent weeks – was ultimately passed, albeit in the light of bizarre scenes in which a socially-distanced queue of MPs snaked hundreds of metres around the parliamentary estate.


Related content


But, in another swift U-turn, government will now also allow MPs aged 70 or those shielding on the basis of medical advice to vote via a designated proxy, who will be permitted to register their colleague’s vote alongside their own. This option will not be available purely on the basis of the location of an MP’s constituency – despite protests from Northern Irish and Scottish members.

Proxy voting has been allowed for MPs on parental leave since January 2019. House speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle maintains the list of registered proxies.

Shadow disability minister Vicky Foxcroft – who is herself shielding – told PublicTechnology sister publication The House: “This is a welcome, albeit partial, U-turn from the Government. Their chaotic and discriminatory plans would have left many MPs unable to vote. However, the hybrid parliament featured online voting, which worked perfectly well and didn't result in MPs wasting 45-minutes queuing when they could be helping constituents. This worked for everyone, including those who are clinically vulnerable, over-70s and those who may live with someone shielding.”

She added: "Returning to this model would send a strong message of inclusion, something many disabled people think is lacking from this government.”

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Government declines to set date for contact-tracing app
8 July 2020

Head of Test and Trace programme Baroness Harding says she does not want to specify a timeframe as projects often do not ‘run in a smooth way’

PM set for Huawei 5G U-turn, reports claim
6 July 2020

The Chinese vendor will be banished from the next-generation network by the end of the year, it has been reported

Rees-Mogg claims ‘compromises of virtual parliament are no longer necessary’
2 June 2020

Motion from leader of the House of Commons will be voted on today, as MPs from all parties voice opposition

Gove believes Whitehall reform plans will not suffer because of close association with Cummings
7 July 2020

Cabinet Office minister said that, despite the controversy that often surrounds the PM’s top adviser, ‘people are interested in Dominic and his ideas’

Related Sponsored Articles

Interview: CyberArk EMEA chief on how government has become a security leader
29 May 2020

PublicTechnology talks to Rich Turner about why organisations need to adopt a ‘risk-based approach’ to security – but first make sure they get the basics right

Accelerating sustainability in the age of disruption
21 May 2020

HPE shows why organisations are increasingly seeking to understand and consider the environmental impacts of their IT purchasing decisions