London man hit with £90 fine after covering face in front of police facial-recognition cameras
Pedestrian stopped and penalised for disorderly behaviour
Credit: Oliver Peters/Pixabay
Police fined an east London man £90 after he was stopped by officers for covering his face in front of facial-recognition cameras.
The incident, which took place during a trial of the technology run in February by the Metropolitan Police Service, was captured by reporters from the BBC’s Click technology news programme. The makers of the programme recorded the subsequent disagreement between the man and a group of officers.
Privacy rights group Big Brother Watch was protesting at the scene, and the organisation’s director Silkie Carlo is seen remonstrating with one officer, whom she asks “what’s your suspicion?”.
“The fact that he’s walked past the clearly marked facial-recognition thing and covered his face gives us grounds to stop him and verify,” the officer responds.
The man is ultimately fined £90 for disorderly behaviour.
- Police ethics body to look at use of facial-recognition technology
- Report claims facial recognition is 95% inaccurate
- Interview: Surveillance Camera Commissioner discusses his mission to protect privacy and human rights
Carlo told the BBC: “There is nothing in UK law that has the words ‘facial recognition’. There is no legal basis for the police to be using facial recognition. There are no legal limitations on how they can use it, no policy, no regulation – this is a free-for-all. We don’t know who is on the watchlists, we didn’t know how long the images are going to be stored for, and the police are making up the rules as they go along. Our ultimate fear is that we would have live facial-recognition capabilities on our gargantuan CCTV network – which is about six million cameras in the UK.”
But Ivan Balhatchet, the Met’s covert and intelligence lead, told the programme that the force’s senior management all believed that “not trialling such technology would be neglectful” on their part.
“We ought to explore all technology, to see how it can keep people safer, how it can make policing more effective,” he added. “However, we are completely aware of some of the concerns that have been raised and what we are doing with these trials is actually trying to understand those better so we can actually protect human rights but keep people safe at the same time.”
He added that the force is “reviewing all capabilities” regarding how facial-recognition kit could and should be deployed in the future.
“Absolutely the technology is there for body-worn or smaller devices to be fitted with facial-recognition technology – [the same is true of] CCTV. So, absolutely we will look at that,” he said. “But, again, the right safeguards, and the right reviews and learning has to be put around that.”
The incident with the London pedestrian occurred during the last of 10 trial programmes run by the Met, concluding earlier this year. The BBC noted that, on the same day as the man was fined, three wanted criminals were arrested after being identified by the cameras.
Earlier this week, lawmakers in San Francisco voted to, effectively, outlaw the use of facial-recognition technology by government entities across the city.
Initiative aims to explore use of technology to limit data extracted during investigations
As our movements increasingly depend on using our smartphones to demonstrate status, we need to ensure technology is secure, according to Dr Sarah Morris, of Cranfield University.
Government signals intent for more-business friendly environment as it plans partnerships with the likes of the US, Colombia, India and Kenya
Having hitherto steadfastly maintained its opposition to issuing physical documents to recipients of EU settled status, the Home Office recently met with campaigners to listen to...