'I've seen no evidence' emergency measures have harmed transparency, says former Whitehall chief

Written by Beckie Smith on 23 March 2021 in News

Mark Sedwill claims that there has been no ‘dilution’ of the ethical standards of politicians and officials

Credit: Han YanTimIreland/Xinhua News Agency/PA Images

The UK’s former top civil servant Mark Sedwill has said there has been “no dilution” of politicians’ and civil servants’ commitment to high ethical standards in recent years, despite a “polarised” political environment and the emergency operational measures necessitated by the pandemic.

Appearing before the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Lord Sedwill said he did not agree with people who have said ethical standards in government have been eroded amid the Brexit and coronavirus crises – but admitted that there was room for scrutiny of decisions that had been taken during that time.

In the wide-ranging session, CSPL members grilled Sedwill, who left his post as cabinet secretary in September, about trust in government, and whether decisions taken during the coronavirus crisis were a cause for concern. Committee members highlighted emergency procurement measures used during the government's pandemic response, which have attracted much criticism, as one example.

"The system has to be able to respond to a crisis. The key thing is: is it responding in a transparent and accountable way? I haven’t really seen hard evidence to suggest it hasn’t,” he said, but added that watchdogs such as the National Audit Office and parliament's Public Accounts Committee may want to look further at the issue in future.

Related content

"In a crisis, you do sometimes have to cut through the normal governance procedures but we have ways of doing that that are properly transparent," Sedwill added. But he said it is possible that when subjected to further scrutiny, some of the decisions to skip normal procedutres may turn out not to have been “justified”.

Committee members were also concerned about whether politicians' commitment to high ethical standards had been affected by the recent period of “acute crisis and pressure”.

But Sedwill said: “I think there’s a difference here between perception and actually some of the underlying reality. In practice, I don’t think I’ve seen any difference or indeed weakening of the commitment of public servants – whether those are political or professional, because I regard politicians as public servants too – to high ethics in government and to the standards that apply.

“Now, of course, we’ve been through a polarised period politically, and therefore there have been more accusations about personal conduct, the neutrality of the civil service, et cetera, which are of course important issues of principle as well, but actually I think notwithstanding that it’s held up just as I would expect.

“And I’ve seen no actual dilution of that commitment, notwithstanding the accusations that are sometimes levelled against the system as a whole, or indeed individuals within it.”

'Egregious incidents'
Also appearing before the committee last week, one of Sedwill’s predecessors, Gus O’Donnell, said he did not share the most recent cab sec’s confidence that ethical standards had remained high among the political classes.

Lord O’Donnell said misleading claims made by ministers about Brexit showed there were “some areas where I think the traditional standards have fallen away”. Ministers’ claims that there was no border in the Irish sea was one example, he said.

He said these claims were a "real issue" impacting trust in government. “It’s this point about telling the truth and people believing what ministers say is actually true," he said.

"It used to be such a cardinal thing – that if you misled parliament that was the end, and that seems to have changed somewhat.”

He also said trust had been damaged by some “egregious incidents” of statistics being misinterpreted or used in a misleading way by politicians.

O’Donnell said ministers should be held to account in a more stringent way for their claims.

“Where you are dealing with factual things that can be checked and statistics, there needs to be a stronger emphasis on someone calling these things out,” he said. “And then a requirement – as we have in press regulation and the paper has to print corrections – that if they do mislead they have to go back to the House and say ‘I’m really sorry, when I said X that wasn’t the case’.”


About the author

Beckie Smith is acting deputy editor of PublicTechnology sister publication Civil Service World, where a version of this story first appeared. She tweets as @Beckie__Smith.

Share this page




Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Government predicts £1.8bn savings over next 15 years from shared services drive
10 March 2023

Cabinet Office issues projections of impact on implementing software ‘clusters’

Phone-bots and social-media alerts – Cabinet Office unveils £1bn plan for tech-powered efficiency savings
8 March 2023

Specialist unit for assessing spending decisions awards £500k to support central department in use of automation and digital

Trust is required in data and the organisations that hold it
13 February 2023

Assuring data, and investing in the infrastructure that supports it, is crucially important, including to Sir Nigel Shadbolt of the Open Data Institute

Consultancy signed to £6.5m deal to advise on eight-department shared-services plan
27 January 2023

The Matrix programme – which includes Treasury, Cabinet Office and DHSC – begins engaging with potential suppliers

Related Sponsored Articles

Digital transformation – a guide for local government
6 March 2023

Digital transformation will play a key role in the future of local government. David Bemrose, Head of Account Strategy for Local Government at Crown Commercial Service (CCS), introduces a new...