ICO investigates police over possible ‘excessive use’ of rape victims' personal data

Written by Sam Trendall on 21 December 2018 in News

Watchdog to work with law enforcement, lawyers, and victim groups

The Information Commissioner’s Office has launched an investigation into potential “excessive use” of the personal data of victims of rape and serious sexual assault.

In recent months, the regulator has received complaints from “multiple victims’ representatives and victim support campaigns” about how data has been handled by police and prosecutors. One of the main issues raised relates to so-called ‘Stafford statements’ – a consent process that investigators rely on in the immediate aftermath of an allegation, according to the ICO.

In a blog post, deputy commissioner James Dipple-Johnstone said: “A Stafford statement can give wide-ranging, blanket consent for police to access detailed and sensitive information, including copies of a victim’s medical, education, psychiatric, social service and family court proceedings records. These records can date from many years prior to the incident under investigation.”

Related content

He added: “But these statements are often signed in the immediate aftermath and shock of the crime, and, we are told, victims can often be unclear as to what they are consenting to and why.”

During its investigation, the ICO “will be working closely with police forces, prosecuting authorities, victims and their representatives and other stakeholders across the UK”. 

The watchdog will track the typical journey of victims’ data, from the time an offence is first reported, through the criminal proceedings, and onto any post-conviction compensation claims. Investigators will be looking “to identify areas where victims’ information is most vulnerable or where processing may be excessive and disproportionate”, Dipple-Johnstone said.

The ICO’s findings and any resulting recommendations will be reported once the investigation has concluded.

The deputy commissioner said: “Ultimately, victims need to be supported and to have confidence that they can give their evidence and information in the knowledge it will be safeguarded, used appropriately and with minimal intrusion into their privacy.”

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology


Share this page




Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

The coronavirus ‘infodemic’: truth and conspiracy online
15 September 2020

The spread of online misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated a public health crisis. PublicTechnology digs into a recent parliamentary inquiry to find out...

Personal data of all Welsh coronavirus cases compromised in breach
15 September 2020

Public Health Wales says leak that affected more than 18,000 people to have tested positive was attributable to ‘human error’

Policymakers must start asking difficult questions on the ethics of AI in healthcare
9 September 2020

Government needs to begin working with citizens and industry to address the risks created by the use of new technology, according to Jessica Morley and Luciano Floridi of the Oxford Internet...