G-Cloud suppliers set for new flexibilities

Written by Colin Marrs on 22 October 2014 in News
News

The government is pushing forward plans to allow suppliers to amend the services they offer via  G-Cloud without having to wait for new iterations of the framework.

Speaking at the 2014 Socitm annual conference in Manchester, Tony Singleton, director of the digital commercial programme at the Government Digital Service, said that he hoped to have the new system in place by next year.

He said that the government was looking at how new amendments to EU regulations relating to dynamic purchasing could be applied to G-Cloud at the earliest opportunity.

“We are talking to Treasury solicitors about how we can move to a dynamic system as soon as the law allows it," he told delegates.

Singleton was addressing a supplier in the audience who raised concerns that his business could lose work because it was unable to offer new services to meet customer needs if they were not listed on their G-Cloud entry.

The government has just closed a consultation on transposing the new EU Public Sector Directive into UK law.

The directive tackles a number of practical problems with the current dynamic purchasing rules which mean they have rarely been used.

Responding to another question, Singleton said that there were no plans to extend the maximum  two-year contract call-off period through G-Cloud.

Nick O’Reilly, director of information systems at Derby City Council, told Singleton that the short contract length acted as a disincentive due to the costs of migration from legacy systems.

But Singleton said that those calculations needed to be considered at the end of two years when a council was deciding whether to stick with its existing G-Cloud supplier. Data held by the GDS, he said, showed that G-Cloud is driving down prices in the marketplace.

He also told the audience that GDS is looking at how to enable customers could get feedback on suppliers from other councils using their services.

A number of audience members raised concerns about the quality of some suppliers registered on the framework, with one saying “there are a lot of crap suppliers on G-Cloud – are these people government should be dealing with?”

Singleton said: “We are looking at creating a community. Not the Trip Advisor route – that could get us into legal difficulties. But we do want to do more to put buyers in touch with other buyers. Through collaboration, we can work out the quality suppliers.”

Finally, Singleton hinted that other government frameworks, such as Local Authority Software Applications, could be hosted on Digital Marketplace in future.

He said: “We are working very closely with the Crown Commercial Service, which is thinking about a new crown marketplace.

“We want to come up with a solution that makes the most sense for the user. We are working out what is the best way of servicing those other frameworks.”

Share this page

Tags

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

Ian Moyse (not verified)

Submitted on 23 October, 2014 - 15:06
As a supplier on G-Cloud we support this. There needs to be more customer feedback options on G-Cloud (such as can be seen at Crowdsourcing review site G2 Crowd) and more diligence of cloud providers certified in light of UK and EU Data laws now and in the new incarnations coming soon. Should for it example be clearer and searchable on providers who stored your data overseas, or who are governed under oversease data sovereignty ! Take for example the recent Microsoft case where USA authorities have demanded data held in Ireland from Microsoft and Microsoft has twice lost the case and ordered to comply, with the courts citing that as a USA entity any data held in a Microsoft service is deemed game for request by USA authorities even if data of an overseas organisation held outside the USA ! G-Cloud needs to more clearly define and make searchable such criteria to ensure vendors are more open on such matters and customers have visibility and ease of filtering as to who they are happy meets their criteria. Ian Moyse

Related Articles

Procurement agency unveils chief commercial officer role
1 June 2022

Newly created CCS post comes with potential £194k pay packet and remit including driving ‘digital agenda’

EXCL: Wall of silence surrounds plan for nationwide collection of citizens’ internet records
26 May 2022

Online notice reveals controversial trials are to be expanded into a national service – about which government, law enforcement, watchdogs and all the UK’s major ISPs declined to answer questions...

Supplier blacklists and non-compliance investigators: Government’s new procurement regime
13 May 2022

Bill introduced during Queen’s Speech proposes a range of reforms

New laws to require websites to ‘proactively seek and remove’ Russian disinformation
7 July 2022

Updated legislation will apply to social networks and search engines