Don’t fear the robots – tech automation to have less impact on public sector jobs, report claims
Study from Nesta and Oxford University predicts that the civil service and wider public sector will see fewer jobs lost to automation than other industries
Transport and manufacturing may be vulnerable to losing jobs to automation, but government jobs will be comparatively unscathed, a report has claimed
Staff in the civil service should not be paranoid about the security of their jobs in the face of continued advances in technology, according to a new report.
The Future of Skills: Employment in 2030 argued that, while UK workers should be prepared for a general rise in automation, education, healthcare, and occupations in the wider public sector will be relatively immune from the trend.
The report, produced by global innovation foundation Nesta and Oxford University’s Oxford Martin School, in conjunction with education firm Pearson, names transport and traditional manufacturing as the main areas where a decline in employment is anticipated over the next decade and beyond.
It says knowledge areas such as English language, history, philosophy, administration and management are all generally associated with occupations forecast to see a rise in workforce share.
More generally, it pointed to a need for current workers to ensure that they maintain skills in areas of demand, as well as ensuring they are able to apply “uniquely human” skills – such as social perceptiveness, active listening, judgement, and decision-making.
- Half of British citizens think government will use robots in the next decade
- iCouncil: Do robots have what it takes for local government?
- Government announces review of AI as Digital Strategy set to boost robotics technologies
The report predicts a general “evolution” of clerical occupations, in which the use of those uniquely human skills is complemented by new skills, such as the application of data-science knowledge.
The report does not consider the impact of the significant reduction in headcount seen in most national and local services since 2010.
However, it does, acknowledge the impact of global and regional political uncertainty on long-term employment trends, with the 9/11 terror attacks cited as a peak. It also cites the "green economy" as one area particularly susceptible to government-level policy reversals.
Pearson chief executive John Fallon said the future of work was brighter than conventional wisdom suggested.
“It is not going to be human versus machine, but rather human and machine,” he said.
Nesta executive director for creative economy and data analytics Hasan Bakhshi added most people could still look forward to having a degree of control over the jobs they do.
“While there is no shortage of research assessing the impacts of automation on individual occupations, there is far less that focuses on skills, and even less so that has actionable insights for stakeholders in areas like job redesign and learning priorities,” he said. “The future of work for most people is not inevitable.”
Last month it emerged the Cabinet Office had commissioned IT consultant Capgemini to conduct a £4m project to explore the potential of robotic process automation across Whitehall.
The deal is understood to involve the creation of a development facility for creating new applications and a teaching centre to help staff learn about how this could help them in their work.
This article originally appeared on PublicTechnology sister publication Civil Service World
Department brings in cyber firm on three-year contract
Gary Aitkenhead is leaving Dstl
Grants to fund industry-led PhD programmes
Plan includes establishment of national AI alliance
SolarWinds explains how public sector organisations can make the most of their hybrid IT investments - delivering services that are both innovative and reliable
Engage Process explains how to ensure that process remains at the heart of your management programs - and how to keep undue pressure from those processes
With the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, every disaster now entails responding to at least two emergencies. Dataminr explains how organisations can best prepare.
Seven years after the Home Office shared findings from its 'Multi-Agency Working and Information Sharing Project', Huddle asks - where are we today?