Digital minister: ‘There is no convincing evidence that 5G is dangerous’
Matt Warman reiterates the line taken by his predecessors that any increase in radiation will be minimal and well within guidelines
Digital minister Matt Warman has reiterated that, as far as the government is concerned, 5G technology should pose no greater health risks to the public as a result of increased exposure to radiation.
Despite the best efforts of both public officials and technology firms, the theory that the deployment of 5G kit will cause a big spike in radiation – and thus pose a far bigger risk to public health than existing comms infrastructure – remains a popular one. And the idea has, evidently, gained some traction in the house of commons with both Warman and his predecessor, Margot James, having fielded written questions related to the issue.
- Local councils could reap £10,000 revenue boost from 5G and full fibre, report finds
- Government must ensure the UK does not cede its 5G leadership
- Government faces Commons backlash over ‘regrettable’ Huawei decision
Last week, Labour MP Preet Kaur Gill asked the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport what steps its ministers are taking “to mitigate health risks to the public from increased EMF/RF (electro and magnetic fields/radio frequency) radiation resulting from the rollout of the 5G network”.
Like James before him, Warman answered by firmly denying that 5G has been shown to have any negative impact on public health. He said that government’s advice continues to take its cue from Public Health England – which, in turn, calls upon guidelines from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).
“Exposure to radio waves is not new and health-related research has been conducted on this topic over several decades,” Warman said. “The ICNIRP is formally recognised by the World Health Organization and its guidelines underpin health-protection policies at UK and European levels.”
He added: “Provided the ICNIRP guidelines are followed, there is no convincing evidence that 5G is dangerous. Government continues to be guided by Public Health England’s advice on the matter. This states that while a small increase in overall exposure to radio waves under 5G is possible, such an increase would remain well within guidelines and can be expected to have no consequence on public health. It is important to note that the ICNIRP guidelines apply up to 300 GHz, well beyond the maximum frequencies under discussion for 5G.”
Department uses CCS framework agreements for two deals worth up to £8.43m
Report finds 126,000 people were told to shield unnecessarily, as well as 30,000 who had already died
DHSC picks higher of Turing Institute’s two estimates of number of cases averted
The Singaporean government’s response to Covid-19 has made extensive use of digital, devices, and data – not always uncontroversially. PublicTechnology talks to Kok Ping Soon, the...
Defence Medical Services (DMS) is pursuing ground-breaking digital, data and technology transformation which will revolutionise Tri-Service healthcare provision to over 135,000 Armed...
Jointly, Equinix and Cintra enable organisations with mission-critical Oracle workloads to accelerate their journey to cloud, while minimising transition risks - here's how
Phishing emails are one of the most pernicious threats facing organisations today. If you’ve been leveraging Microsoft 365 and Azure to keep your users productive whilst working remotely, Six...
OneTrust presents the reasons why your organisation should invest in privacy management - and offers three easy tips for getting started