Covid contracts: PAC chair calls out use of procurement short-cuts

Written by PublicTechnology staff on 29 September 2022 in News

Meg Hillier claims that massive deals were awarded without competition as emergency measures were used for longer than required

Credit: Pxhere

The chair of parliament’s Public Accounts Committee has criticised an ongoing lack of transparency surrounding vast sums of taxpayers’ money spent on Covid-related contracts that were awarded without the usual checks and balances. 

As part of its move to an emergency-response footing, in the early days of the coronavirus crisis government loosened procurement rules to enable public bodies to buy key goods and services as a matter of urgency. This encompassed testing services and crucial medical supplies such as personal protective equipment (PPE), as well as range of other services – including the delivery major technology and data-centric projects, such as the Test and Trace programme. 

In a piece written exclusively for PublicTechnology sister publication The House Live, PAC chair Meg Hillier said that the public-spending watchdog has long “has been sounding the alarm about poor record-keeping, huge profits made by some companies, and contracts awarded without competition”.

She added that, while the award of contacts without any competitive process was allowed as part of the emergency relaxation of buying procedures, the practice had “extended beyond the early days of the pandemic”.

Related content

“Even when companies failed to deliver on their obligations, contracts were extended to the tune of millions of pounds, often without testing the market,” she said.

Government’s deals with testing firm Randox – through which almost £800m were spent – are cited by Hillier as an example of a failure to keep even “basic records” on negotiations and whether or not standard best practices, such as price benchmarking, were followed.

“Every penny of taxpayers’ money spent must be accounted for and decision-makers held accountable,” she wrote. “For this, transparency and good record-keeping is vital. It is simply not good enough to throw overboard basic procedures and due diligence during a crisis.”

As the commencement of the public inquiry on the pandemic draws close, the committee chair noted that “spending hasn’t stopped, [as] the government has hired top public relations and legal firms in preparation” for the independent examination.

“All this casts a murky shadow,” she said. “In the words of a previous prime minister (David Cameron), sunlight is the best disinfectant. Without a clear record of what happened, as billions was spent, sunlight will struggle to reach some corners of the Covid response.”

The PAC chair’s full piece can be read here



Share this page




Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Expanded NHS England taps McKinsey to design data and analytics model in £1m deal
15 March 2023

Management consultancy brought in to help shape national body’s use of data

Government predicts £1.8bn savings over next 15 years from shared services drive
10 March 2023

Cabinet Office issues projections of impact on implementing software ‘clusters’

Government plans national platform for sharing of social-care data
1 March 2023

DHSC shortly to begin work on system due to launch in 2024

NHS plans £150m framework to help solve trusts legacy issues with patient data
23 February 2023

Health service identifies problems caused by organisations’ requirement to maintain multiple systems

Related Sponsored Articles

Digital transformation – a guide for local government
6 March 2023

Digital transformation will play a key role in the future of local government. David Bemrose, Head of Account Strategy for Local Government at Crown Commercial Service (CCS), introduces a new...