Commission cites need for ‘fundamental reform’ of Whitehall
Panel featuring former government chiefs opines that UK civil service is 'no longer world-class'
Credit: Anthony Devlin/PA Archive/PA Images
A newly created panel that has the ear of Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove has published a 35-page report setting out why it believes Whitehall is unfit for purpose and “in need of fundamental reform”.
The Commission for Smarter Government said there was “serious dysfunctionality” in the UK’s machinery of government and that it was “no-longer world class”, with outdated practices for managing people and skills among the areas in need of urgent reform.
Its What’s gone wrong with Whitehall? report also points to the government’s poor track record of preventing deaths from Covid-19 and longer-term “running policy sores”, such as the failure of successive administrations to reform social care as examples of the need for change.
Members include former Department for Education perm sec Lord Michael Bichard, former Home Office and Department for International Development perm sec Sir Suma Chakrabarti, former government lead non-executive director Sir Ian Cheshire and Herbert himself. Also on the panel are Baroness Simone Finn, a former adviser on civil service reform to Lord Francis Maude; Baroness Camilla Cavendish, former head of the No.10 policy unit; and former HM Revenue and customs chief digital officer Jacky Wright.
- Reform adviser Maude dismisses ‘myth’ of UK civil service supremacy
- Gove believes Whitehall reform plans will not suffer because of close association with Cummings
- ‘The civil service needs to modernise’ – departing Whitehall chief urges officials to engage with ‘substance’ of Cummings reform plans
Cabinet Office minister Gove referred directly to the commission in his Ditchley lecture in June, describing it as one of the sources of “ideas on transforming how we deliver” that ministers needed to listen to.
The lecture saw Gove set out a vision for reform that includes better use data science in designing policy and boosting skills in areas including digital.
The commission describes What’s gone wrong with Whitehall? as a discussion paper, rather than a manifesto for change, and cited Moodys' recent downgrading of the UK’s credit rating and the nation’s standing in the World Bank’s governance ratings as evidence of its claims.
The report concluded that while there are “many strengths in the UK system of government” the commission is “driven by an increasing concern that, against the background of national and global change and challenges, it is not world class”. This is despite the UK civil service being named top of the Oxford University’s Blavatnik School of Government and the Institute for Government’s International Civil Service Effectiveness Index.
The commission said the next stage of government reform needs to be based on a big picture, tackling the main elements, including the challenge the centre of government faces in pulling the whole of government together to ensure that its priorities are delivered and more effective use of performance and financial data.
“The roles and performance of both politicians and the civil service, and the relationship between them, need to change,” it said. “Above all, the government needs to find a way to ensure that initial energy and commitment are maintained, plans are carried through, it learns from mistakes and improves, and recognises that change has to be continuous.”
Share this page
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS
Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.
In a piece written for PublicTechnology, parliamentary secretary Alex Burghart discusses progress with One Login and the significance of legislative changes
In the first of a series of exclusive interviews, the head of government’s ‘Digital HQ’ talks to PublicTechnology about the Central Digital and Data Office’s work to unlock £8bn...
Richard Lochhead compares technology to previous industrial revolutions and says government’s job is to minimise harms and spread opportunities
Minister reveals that newly created department is still working on employee transfers
Related Sponsored Articles
The traditional reactive approach to cybersecurity, which involves responding to attacks after they have occurred, is no longer sufficient. Murielle Gonzalez reports on a webinar looking at...