‘There is a strong suspicion that optimism is designed to get project approval’

Written by Richard Johnstone on 15 November 2019 in News

NAO head claims many government programmes are dogged by unrealistic costings and creeping scope

Credit: Rawpixel/CC BY 2.0

The head of the National Audit Office Gareth Davies has claimed that government projects are often initially presented with unrealistic cost projections in a bid to get approval.

In an exclusive interview with the Civil Service World Podcast, Davies who took up his post in June, set out his plans for the organisation, which audits government departments and agencies. This has included launching a strategic review of the NAO that will be informed by its work around Brexit.

In a wide-ranging discussion, the NAO head shed light on lessons taken from his career on how to run good projects. These include ensuring realistic costings and attempting to limit the scope of a project creeping outwards.

“There's so many examples of over optimistic costs, with the strong suspicion that some of that optimism is designed to get approval for the project,” he said. “Then reality is only confronted much later, when it's a whole different bunch of people who are responsible and accountable.”

Related content

Davies added: “I think government does have to work even harder on improving the credibility of initial cost estimates at the approval stage and getting more assurance than it currently does that it is not an unrealistically optimistic assumption that's going to be shown to be so in a few years time.”

Increases in the scope “bedevils every major project” and it takes strong management from departments “to make sure that for whatever reason, whether it's coming from ministers, whether it's coming from contractors, whether it's coming from the customers of the service that you're that you're designing, that you stay in control of the scope”.

“It's so easy for extra bits of design to creep in as the project gets underway for the case to be made it every time that this would be an essential improvement in what you'd originally designed. Those can add up to explain a lot of the overspending that we've seen in the years.”

Davies worked as UK head of public services for international audit firm Mazars from 2012 until joining the NAO, and before Mazars he was managing director of the audit practice at the Audit Commission, and spent a total of 25 years at the watchdog.


Listen to the full interview – and subscribe for future episodes of the Civil Service World podcast – on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, and Spotify.



About the author

Richard Johnstone is deputy and online editor of PublicTechnology sister publication Civil Service World. He tweets as @CSW_DepEd.

Share this page




Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles

The rapid, low-risk cloud transition solution for Oracle customers
1 March 2021

Jointly, Equinix and Cintra enable organisations with mission-critical Oracle workloads to accelerate their journey to cloud, while minimising transition risks - here's how

How digital is helping Defence Medical Services re-imagine HM Armed Forces healthcare
3 February 2021

Defence Medical Services (DMS) is pursuing ground-breaking digital, data and technology transformation which will revolutionise Tri-Service healthcare provision to over 135,000 Armed...

How Your Privacy Program is a Competitive Differentiator
29 January 2021

OneTrust presents the reasons why your organisation should invest in privacy management - and offers three easy tips for getting started 

Email security incidents happen every 12 hours – it’s time to close the gap in Microsoft 365
21 January 2021

The remote-first world has seen email being relied on more than ever as a core communication mechanism - but with 93% of IT leaders acknowledging a risk to sensitive data, what steps should be...