The research says that:
> Nearly 60% of leading disability websites fail basic accessibility checks
> Results indicate web accessibility is not yet embedded within the sector
> A handful of exemplary websites leading the sector
The research carried out by Ethical Media reveals the gap between the rhetoric and the reality of disability groups' communications activities and points to an urgent need to address web accessibility, usability and effective digital communications in the disability sector.
The Disability 50 Accessibility Report reviewed the standard of accessibility of 50 leading UK disability websites benchmarking these against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) developed by global and industry-led standards body W3C.
Significantly, 58% failed to achieve a compliance level, which the WCAG state as ‘compulsory'.
Head of Digital Communications at Ethical Media, Keith Patton says:
This shows what many people have suspected for some time: that organisations in or supporting the disability sector do not yet adequately consider web accessibility and usability as a priority in their communications strategies. As a result, significant proportions of users are likely to find it difficult, even impossible, to access information, restricting the flow of communication between any given organisation and its customer base.
Although the majority of disability groups fail to comply with W3C global standards a few organisations are proving to be exemplary in this field including:
AbilityNet (http://www.abilitynet.org.uk), Action for Blind People (http://www.afbp.org) British Council for Disabled People (www.bcodp.org.uk) and the Disability Rights Commission (http://www.drc-gb.org).
Managing Director of Ethical Media, Paul Sternberg says:
Ethical Media's survey highlights the need for disability groups to lead by example and walk their own talk. It also shows the number of conflicting communications pressures that these organisations face. With the right approach and strategy there is no reason why disability groups can't integrate accessibility within their own communications. The risk of not doing this could have far-reaching reputational implications.
Related links to this article:
Ethical Media
Background information to this article:
To request a copy of the Disability 50 Accessibility Report email Keith Patton at keith@ethicalmedia.com or call 0207 833 8825 (Mobile: 07866 734 028)
"Several weeks into the new era of Coaltiion Government and certain key themes are emerging. First up, it's clear that the battle of the 'who can get their memoirs out the door quick enough to steal a march in the revisionist history stakes' has been triumphantly won by M'Lord Mandelson (Weren't those TV ads scary – the velvet smoking jacket, the leather fireside chair, all that Brillcream! The only thing missing was the theme tune to Tales of the Unexpected and the accompanying prancing sillouette of Harriet Harman or Diane Abbott dancing!)” Read more
Colin Rickard, managing director EMEA at SAS subsidiary Dataflux, argues public sector data must be of high quality if the efficiencies promised with ICT and infrastructure is to be realised.
"Tackling the public sector’s data integration and data quality challenges is a tough prospect. The challenge may require more effort than a comparative project in a large private company. Data must be governed according to a strategy that necessitates bringing interested parties together.” Read more
Complete and enter our draw to win a free seat at the e-Government Awards. The public sector is already perceived to be lacking in innovation, but is that a fair assessment, and what role could it play in helping the government meet efficiency targets? What do people working on the frontline of ICT in public sector organisations think? Take part and share your views
Source: K2 Advisory