The Nomensa report says that 85% of London borough web sites have yet to achieve the web accessibility recommendations that have been defined by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Priority Service Outcomes Report. 6% of sites tested are meeting this standard, while 9% have exceeded the recommendation, and have achieved a triple-A rating as defined by the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI).
Web accessibility, a main concern for any organisation's online web strategy, is considered to be a priority for UK local authorities as it sets a standard for inclusivity and permits everyone in the community to have access to council services and information. However, with such minimal results in the ‘double A' and ‘triple A' standings, Nomensa believes there is significant scope for improvement.
Leonie Watson, Nomensa's Head of Accessibility states: 'In many cases, accessibility has not been given due recognition, putting fundamental barriers in the way of many people accessing local authority services online.'
Last month, the Prime Minister's Strategy Unit and the DTI in partnership with industry published a national strategy that will define the UK as a world leader in digital excellence. Highlighted in the report, ‘Connecting the UK: the Digital Strategy', the Prime Minister emphasises online accessibility as a key action that will '…improve accessibility to technology for the digitally excluded.'
The Nomensa report is a detailed study that closely examines how London borough councils are achieving these targets, and identifies areas where they are failing. Measured against 10 best practice criteria for web accessibility, the evaluation process was a combination of manual and automated testing, with nine of the categories carried out through manual evaluation. The web sites were tested on two occasions, over a period of three months. This method reveals how sites have changed over time, allowing the reader to examine sustainability rather than just looking at single event analysis.
Key findings of the report are:
> A vast majority of London Borough web sites have yet to achieve the web accessibility recommendations defined by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Priority Service Outcomes Report. 85% of sites tested did not meet double-A compliance.
> 79% of sites tested are failing to code their web sites with valid HTML code as recommended by the World Wide Web Consortium's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
> A decrease by 8% in the number of sites providing text only alternatives shows that London councils are moving away from insipid text only sites to achieve accessibility
> From November 2004 to February 2005, a 14% improvement was made in the quality of links used by London borough councils.
> The top three councils in the February league table were Haringey, Barking & Dagenham, and Redbridge Council. The bottom three were Hammersmith and Fullham, Bromley and Barnet Council.
The Web Accessibility in London Borough Councils report, conducted by Nomensa, provides an accessibility analysis of the 33 London local authority web sites checked against 10 best practice criteria representing key accessibility principles.
The globally recognised benchmark for accessibility, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offer three grades of accessibility based on the successful fulfilment of different criteria. Basic accessibility is recognised by the ‘single A' grade, while ‘double A' is given to those attaining an intermediate level of accessibility and those attaining optimum accessibility gain ‘triple A' rating.
The results contained in the report are based on combined manual and automated accessibility testing carried out on two occasions, November 2004, and February 2005 respectively. The report identifies techniques used to evaluate each site, the overall score each site achieved and a detailed analysis of the results produced. The report also presents a league table of results on a site-by-site basis.
Related links to this article:
Nomensa
Full details of the 2005 Awards entry schedules, supported by the Cabinet Office e-Government Unit will be announced soon. Platinum sponsor is KPMG.
"In an attempt to do the famous 'Charm Thing' with a certain Bill Gates, Tony Blair “got all [his] terminology mixed up”. Whichever Oxbridge-educated candidate ends up heading [fill in appropriate temporal adjective] Labour come the end of September, let's hope they'll be worrying less about the right nomenclature for enterprise computing platforms and more about policies that might get some more wealth-creating industry back in the country.”
Read more
Neal Perry, Country Manager UK, Ireland & Middle East, at EPiServer talks about how some of the UK's European partners are implementing social media to strengthen citizen engagement.
"Across the World, governments created groups to explore the problems and the potential for strengthening citizen participation in local government. They then reunited the ‘champions of participation’ from countries in every continent to identify lessons and how sharing this experience might inform and shape policy and practice. Social media is one tool where organisations can embrace such initiatives and is an especially effective one when it comes to engaging the younger public." Read more
Complete and enter our draw to win a free seat at the e-Government Awards. The public sector is already perceived to be lacking in innovation, but is that a fair assessment, and what role could it play in helping the government meet efficiency targets? What do people working on the frontline of ICT in public sector organisations think? Take part and share your views
Source: Gartner