Government ‘vulnerable’ to over-complication by technologists, says Policy Exchange researcher

Written by Rebecca Hill on 7 June 2016 in News

Public sector reforms are stalling because of a lack of technological expertise and a failure to encourage innovation, according to centre-right think tank Policy Exchange.

The government often takes a top-down approach that simply adds new technologies, rules or managers on top of an existing problem, Damian Hind, economic and social policy research fellow at the think tank, has said.

This, he said, creates “a random hotchpotch of initiatives” that aren’t innovative.

Related content

Final version of Digital Service Standard for councils published
The digital black hole in Britain's welfare system

A further issue the public sector faces is that it cannot compete with private sector salaries for the best talent.

This means government has to bring in consultants, but Hind argues in a blogpost on the think tank's website that this leaves it “vulnerable to capture” by technologists who often build complex systems or processes into a project.

As an example, he cites the Universal Credit project that was established to streamline six existing benefits into one payment.

“It started with the assumption that streamlining benefits was the right solution for the whole system without testing it small scale,” Hind said.

“Success depended heavily on the introduction of new technologies that tried to imitate smart automation systems used in the private sector without fully understanding their replicability.”

In addition, the government has not been able to be flexible or adaptable because the timings and resources were determined upfront in a detailed business plan that was hard to change.

Hind said that the public sector should be given more freedom to innovate, and build experimentation into the mainstream policymaking process.

Local government is crucial for this innovation, he said, especially with the devolution agenda offering local authorities a good opportunity for such experimentation.

“They [local service reforms] are also less likely to be burdened with the same levels of expectation, media scrutiny and unionisation that can undermine radical public service reform at the national level”, Hind said.

A further recommendation is that the public sector focus on managing projects at a smaller scale, and Hind picks out the Government Digital Service as an example of how government has successfully used this approach.

Image credit: Mark Skinner, Flickr

Share this page


Add new comment

Related Articles

Driverless pods, smart sensors, and citizen apps – inside the plan to future-proof Milton Keynes
4 January 2018

In a town gaining 40,000 extra citizens each decade, the council's strategy chief Geoff Snelson tells PublicTechnology why smart-city ideas and technology need to be an...

2017 in review - part one
28 December 2017

The first of a two-part recap of 2017 looks at the biggest stories and most significant developments in the first six months of the year

EU data-protection agreement need not compromise Brexit trade deals – techUK CEO
19 February 2018

Trade body leader Julian David writes to international trade secretary Liam Fox to argue that the UK must adhere to data-protection rules to remain a tech-industry leader